Education's Mutual Exclusivity

Education is reputedly on-going, in the middle of global immiseration (UN-MDG-1/SGD-1: 2000 -2015-2030) as the number one, in a striking manner, with an associated global nonremittal on social action or social policy of reform; with her consequential wars and rumors of wars. Education fundamentally should be able to define her overtures and significances, or query why a 13 -14 or 17 year-old pupil within an educational framework or institution, should fail to discern value from diminution, and would rather fund the cheek to decimate.

The universal law on education requires education to be directed towards the full development of the human personality; the Universal Declaration of Human rights – Right to Education Article 26 part 2 requires educational design that ensures and undertakes full development of the human personality over an ephemeral putative model, or her accompanying wicked issues.
Utile Education for many, remains very bedeviling, and what is more, in the absence of common sense that oppugns or calls into question the learner outcome of education.
1. What is education?
2. What is the foundation of education?
3. What is the direction of education?
3. What is the learner outcome? Employer or Employee? Full development or tenuous development?
What better ingression to avoid non – utilitarianism than the excellence of utile educational stakeholding; to focus on the universal law (UDHR Article 26) as the nonpareil imperium of education.
What better war on effete educability than adumbrating whether your chosen educational ethics tally and emphasize utility or purpose?
What better way to divest and dissever a global-institutional educational double entendre, than to formally-officially abandon (give up with the intent of never claiming again) malversation?
What better preparation to bankruptcy or failure than a continuous formulaic betrothment of what doesn’t work, by a longshot gamble of circumventions;
A pathetic babying, pampering and coddling aphasia of education non-utilitarianism. An overt pathetic educability to educational dictum (UDHR Article 26) – an irrefutable, unquestionable unenlightenment by parents, mentors, counsellors and institutions, as putative educational regimes, flacking a derisory denotation to education or her scholarship.
A formulaic betrothment of what doesn’t work is continuously preferring the inutile convention, traditionally or tralatitiously (as a handed-down practice) and in the light of undeniable unenlightenment to educational dictum or laws (nationally and internationally: Universally), exacting and arrogating such choices or decisions within the bounded scope of the law. So, where’s the emergence? Where's the global emergence?